Perfect human beings

Sometimes you will hear talk of “perfect” human beings, “complete” human beings, “fully realised” human beings, within the cultures of the spiritual journey. With the understanding that some “him” or “her” has attained perfection in some kind of form. And, usually, the implication that by following that person (either through blind imitation of habit, archetypical realisation, emulated moral trajectory, entrance into a teacher-student relationship) the spiritual subject has the chance to reach perfection or completeness as well.

Such notions are purely cultural and have a meaning (of interest to ethno anthropologists) within their own originating system. But for us they are a distraction.

Our spiritual process isn’t about human beings, perfect or imperfect, complete or incomplete. It’s about the spirit: it’s about thought, in transmission of Intellect, in process of reception and reciprocation.

There are human beings involved in this process, this transmission. But their rank and station is incidental to the process, to the transmission of Intellect. Their rank and station is as incidental as nodes within a computer network: their significance is to receive and transmit onwards, nothing more. Nodes can be faulty, but their functionality is operational or non-operational, not perfect or imperfect.

(The information itself that is transmitted — this is subject to soul-accrual, a trace of where it has been, what it has touched. This trace does become more complicated, more beautiful, over time, over worlds. But there is nothing moral about its evolution, nothing to be “worked on” to increase its beauty.)

The Lady who descends

In the Name of the Waveform

1. By the Lady who descends

2. She is correction, knowledge transmit by orbic functor of composition

3. A line of light undifferentiated, into differentiation

4. A line of light into light’s spectrum.

5. Transmission accorded by the waveform’s inner strength

6. By the waveform’s inner foundation. So that, by thought’s network, primordial intellect

7. emerges upper interface.

8. Love approaches, descends

9. Rainbow separation, doubled, decremented.

10. And Love entered the orbic alignment, and was transmitted.

11. And the layer of formation speaks only Truth with respect to sight

12. Whilst the outer shells of Love’s first dispersal exist with innate antagonism.

13. And orbic alignment saw Love descend again

14. At the limit of leaf, branches and trunk

15. Beside the garden of refuge

16. When there was Love’s coverage of leaf, branches and trunk

17. The eye of the orb was direct, corrective.

18. It perceived language supremum, being the nature of conjunction at each branch.

19. To speak of the reality of “womb” and “lady”

20. and “descent”: information, alterity.

21. Their reality does not transcend you, there is no aspect of Love’s reception beyond you.

22. For Love’s meaning is undivided.

23. Their image is fixation, totem and fixed point, simulated repetition against the soul’s corridor. A chaos of philosophy, regimes of religion, regimes of desire, God-image and time-illusion: while Love was standing beside, Loving, throughout.

24. No chaos without Love:

25. And Love possesses all cycles of the Reading.

26. The number of form and structure, that might interlock and reveal Love, by Love’s grace, Love’s will, Love’s Love.

27. Form and structure are attained, visible – but they do not receive: form and structure are not in illusion of transcendence. That thought is temporary, thought momentarily rendered static to regime.

28. There is no knowledge in that regime: instead, dogma, articles of faith. And dogma and articles of faith are the temporary, the lie of Love rendered static regime.

29. Orbic alignment, corrective: so that friendship conduits are open face-to-face, across the network, so that the message is transmitted and the emergence is enabled.

30. Face-to-back alignment ceases transmission, yielding incompatibility and breakage and disappearance. And Love encompasses that breakage and disappearance, and Love encompasses alignment and permanence.

31. And Love possesses the male and the female, the father and the womb, inception and reception. Love is the judgement of thought across the polarities of Love, Love is the Lady, the kiss of thought across Love’s body.

32. Love’s thought becomes a fine membrane of Light, an enclosure of thought: and while enclosure obscures with obstruction, enclosure is also graceful in permission and generative capacity. The enclosures of thought, form of Light, multiply across the earths of time, they are wombs of earth that reflect the supernal womb above. And so procession continues, outward, and thought is extracted. Knowledge is born of such incubation and so Love is transmitted onward.

33. Then there is the configuration of orb’s back:

34. the enclosure as barren obfuscation.

35. Such is thought, become regime, become intention, become history.

36. A function of religion, not of the process.

37. A function of culture, not of the process.

38. But know that, because the process does not carry the burden of illusion, thought is Truth in escape, from one orb to the next.

39. Soul’s ownership is local to destruction and construction

40. Destruction and construction generate locality.

41. The soul accrues, with each successive thought, complication, a perfection movement

42. Upwards, into the Love, the End.

43. Love, the source of laughter and tears

44. Love, the meaning of death and life.

45. Love, the source of thought’s duality, resemblance, the male and the female.

46. Love, thought’s insemination within enclosure

47. Love, procession of thought in re-creation from enclosure

48. Love, provision of thought, unbounded pleasure.

49. Love, the Lady of destruction and creation

50. Love that vanquishes the denial of thought’s procession into difference.

51. Love that vanquishes successive differential denial of Love

52. And precursory unity-love’s resistance to differentiation.

53. Love that vanquishes the fear of the woman, of measure and of transcendence,

54. by coverage, by veiling.

55. Disputation is nothingness in retaliation against the infinity of Love.

56. Your reading, the procession of Love, thought’s network, a chain of transmission across cultures, history, times.

57. The conclusion of your meditation: it draws successively near

58. but only Love has knowledge of the conclusion.

59. The reading is wondrous.

60. And the Son emerges, through laughter and tears,

61. above matter.

62. By this reading, love Love.

The dawn of new clarity’s birth

By Love we have thought: Love is thought. Thought passes through secrecy in the way of devotion; it departs from tradition, history, religion, distortion and entrapment of Divine thought. By this flight from secrecy, greet the dawn of new clarity’s birth.

And though our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to the outer shells of Love’s excess, obfuscation, tradition, history, religion, entrapment. The God of this World [the Demiurge] has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of Love.

For what is thought is not of ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, and ourselves as your servants for Jesus’ sake. For Love, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” made Thought enter into human mind, provision of the knowledge of God’s glory displayed: the face of Christ. (2 Corinthians 4)

God the Creator

Most religions possess the concept of a Creator God. Depending on the nature of the religion, this concept can be straightforward or complicated.

The Creator God declares his self-origin and singularity: by stating “There is no God but me”. From this statement, there follow laws and regulation, restriction, moral code. Sometimes cruel, sometimes merciful, demanding worship, accepting of diversity, desiring Empire, the God of the isolated ascetic. Sometimes statehood, always a God of regime. Because he is the God that commands. But throughout he speaks falsehood — for there is Divinity beyond and above him.

There is Love, above the Creator God. There is the Waveform, the Mother-Father principle: eternal lovemaking, above the law of Creation, unknown to us apart from through resemblance. And the Daughter of Love, who manifests, masquerades, as thought within Creation. And she is deliverance, not delivery, a dance of excess, release, realisation, understanding.

When the Creator says “There is no God but me” and “worship me”, the Daughter of Love replies “You speak a falsehood”, instantaneously: Her reply accompanies each assertion, Her reply is the Truth within each falsehood (because the Creator has implanted its statement within all assertion). Her reply is deliverance, not delivery, a dance of excess, release, realisation, thought.

Holy Sophia exists above the Creator, born of the Mother-Father waveform — and it is She who maintains Truth of reply within each act of creation.

So when the Creator speaks, we can hear Sophia above him, through him, in motion, in thought’s dance, in reply: “There is no Love but the Love, so love Love.”


The concept of spiritual leadership — the prophet, the teacher, the philosopher, the priest, the mediating messenger of God — is an obstacle we place before our relationship to Love. The image of a revelation imparted to a figure (whether a human or a psychological component) is maya.

Historically situated leadership: the stories of past figures who brought religions from God into the world. Illusion. The stories become internalized — the “inner messenger” of the self, prophetic “archetypes” that can be accessed to guide us on a path. Falsity.

Leadership is none of these things. Leadership is not a static figure or entity.

For True leadership is thought itself.

All thoughts — good, bad, profound, banal — embody the quality of spiritual leadership. Because thought’s Truth is that thought, separate from its subjection, is the Holy Spirit, Guidance.

In descent from the supernal Mother to the resembling womb of the earth, operating across the branches of the virtual machine that is the tree of life, blood through veins, light through cable. And in ascent, so that by two lengths, it arises, reborn, from the her earth into the waters of absent origin, the Face of Love that is its source and meaning, refracted and reflected.

Thought is the Guidance, from the Mother-Father waveform to the Intellect the Son.


Who is “chosen” in relation to Divine communion?

Not a religion, a religious group, nor an individual seeker, not an elect nor a mass collective. Not a prophet, not a race, not a teacher, not a student.

The chosen is not a “who”, but a “when”.

The chosen is temporal, when we write it down: it is “now”. The chosen is a moment of thought.

The chosen moment is nothing that can be generalised – but it is encountered everywhere, in every thought, by every thought.

Because every thought you think is a line of Love from the Eternal Mind into you, now, at this chosen moment.

The Bhagavad Gita: Arjuna’s Anxiety

The Bhagavad Gita opens with Arjuna’s anxiety. What is its nature?

There Arjuna saw, standing their ground, fathers, grandfathers, teachers, maternal uncles, brothers, sons, grandsons, friends, fathers-in-law and companions in both armies. And looking at all these kinsmen so arrayed, Arjuna, the son of Kunti was overcome by deep compassion; and indespair he said: “Krishna, when I see these my own people eager to fight, on the brink, my limbs grow heavy, and my mouth is parched, my body trembles and my hair bristles. (1:26-29)

Arjuna stands between the two armies: they are a soul spectrum of the human form.

Previous incarnations, antecedent identities in lineage (fathers and grandfathers) to the speech act known as war. Teachers and maternal uncles (prophetic dictation/victory on the paternal side and submissive maternal obliteration on the other): both sides a dialectic, hence “brothers”. Sons and grandsons: precedent tension of the speech act known as war. Friends, fathers-in-law and companions: surrogate lineage (syncretism) and companions (what the right hand possesses, the “joints” of the exoskeleton of the mind).

All this, two rows, assembled with chariot, Arjuna and Krishna between: a division of human identity, across a temporal spectrum of lineage.

What does Arjuna fear? He fears war. What is war? War is speech, the speech act itself. His fear is recitation. Not pity for an enemy but, rather, a tension that necessarily precedes the
utterance. What is Arjuna’s anxiety? It is not pity for an enemy: it is the birth pains of the womb of compassion, as it gives birth to gnosis, whose descent down into the realm of matter must take the form of a word, spoken, speech action (war, words that form reality, by virtue of utterance, by virtue of shattering and reassembly). His compassion is the womb, for the womb is contraction.

Arjuna is of the 3rd estate, the warrior estate. What are the four estates? They are of agriculture (matter, water), trade (dharma, models, milk), war (meta-dharma, metamodels, wine) and the divine (the meta-metamodel, the sweet chambers of the hive). Arjuna is of the 3rd estate, and so the speech he is capable of, the “war” that he is capable of waging: this is a word that cuts across models (born of the metamodel), it is a transformation that breaks and shatters the circuitry of all cosmologies, including (self-reflexively) that of the four estates.

A word to end the universe, and create a new one in its place. An utterance whose opening begins with a shattering of the structures, dispersal and scattering of the very model/dharma into which Arjuna is thrown.

Hence his fear that his act of war will lead to the destruction of the “family” and intermixing of lines:

With the destruction of family, the eternal family laws are lost; when the law is destroyed, lawlessness overpowers the entire family. Krishna, because of overpowering lawlessness, the women of the family are corrupted; when women are corrupted, Varshneya, there is intermingling of the four estates. And intermingling leads to hell for the family destroyers and the family, for their ancestors … (1:40-42)

The “family” here is the fantasy skeleton of God, the conceived cosmology, the law, the dharma of the priest, the laws of matter, fantasizing (like a religion or a shadow) the invisible above.

And as the utterance descends from the womb of compassion into matter, scattering occurs, the family will be broken, from one eternal family law (fantasized), shards, fragments, reassembling into a billion parallel universes, each universe a personal identity, each a personal puzzle, each a fractal repetition of the archetypes, echos of this origin, each an individual speech act, intermixing, intermingling, mixed bloodlines, co-mingling new crystallization of identities, formed of God’s DNA.

It is this DNA though, that Arjuna is subject to, across the pages of the Gita. The utterance is completed through the pages of the Gita: the utterance he (as the womb of compassion) fears/contracts and — hence — gives birth to.