Religious modes

The most sublime thing – the unnamable – we signify at this moment by post modernity’s Tetragrammaton, movements influenced.

Influenced by what seem to be (rereadings of) psychoanalytic complexes, the Oedipal being the most obvious.

But there is something living within the process of creation – something personal: the “I”, or eye. The speaking subject, floating along the streams of its informational reincarnation …

Active agent: godlike, humanlike.

So when I look back at where I was in relation to the spiritual inheritance, and I see a fulfilment and then a subsequent departure of divinity: I remind myself that the active path remains a continuum and it is this Elohim continuum that I am. From temple to text to the next form: I am.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s