With respect to the three orders we have discussed, Prophetic speech/thought/action/perception, like all speech/thought/action/perception, is always made within the Symbolic order but in such a way that there is no Imaginary component to it. In this sense it is a speech that is purely authentic negotiation of the Symbolic. But surely — as we have also noted — there is metonymic speech that is simply madness. Or at least, speech of the unconscious: dreams. A life lived within the realm of the unconscious, as in a dream — is not illuminated. At best it is 1/46th of Prophecy.
But how does the property of illumination figure in this framing, to make metonymic Speech prophetic?